Categories
Uncategorized

Which Is The Better Opening Line – And WHY?

  1. Every drum was silent as the noose slipped over his head and tightened around his neck.

  2. Every drum was silent as the noose slipped over his head.

  3. Every drum was silent as the noose tightened around his neck.

Which is the better opening line – first? Second? Third? NONE?

 

And why is it better?

 

Comment below.

43 replies on “Which Is The Better Opening Line – And WHY?”

Neither. The REAL first sentence is “Every drum was silent.” you don’t need “and”, go straight to “The noose slipped over his head.” Then “He felt it tighten around his neck.”
A three sentence opening sequence with punch. Or you could begin with “The drums fell silent”.

The drums fell silent. The noose slipped over his head. He felt it tighten around his neck.

Liked by 6 people

It really depends whether ‘he’ is the protagonist (who will escape for the noose before long) or just some bloke the protagonist is observing. It was because I assumed the first option that I wanted the reader to feel that noose tightening.

Liked by 2 people

well, the third is less wordy because its evident the noose slipped over his head, but I sort of like the cadence of the first one. plus its a dramatic scene and the extra line gives me more time to soak it in.

Liked by 2 people

If I had to pick from these three I’d pick the third. The noose tightening around the neck is a closer vicarious experience. But if it were my story I’d make it two sentences (as Frank pointed out).
The drums fell silent. The noose tightened around his neck.
Or if you want less choppy and more sensory:
As the drummer’s final bang echoed across the silent crowd, the coarse rope tightened around Bob’s neck.

Liked by 4 people

The first one is too wordy: …the noose slipped over his head…

I like the third one. It gives me the feeling that the drums are about to startup and add an audio element to the action.
Ω

Liked by 2 people

I prefer the third – I think the first is too long and the third option is more dramatic and assumes the second. Personally a prefer one medium length sentence to two or three shorter ones, but that’s just me. Shorter sentences are more dramatic, but I prefer a more flowing sentence.

Liked by 2 people

Good. And, do you agree? This summer I read a book on E.B. White. He struggled for a year on the opening sentence of “Charlotte’s Web”. If you read his drafts, you see that he just “got to it” and cut to the chase… much like #3.

Liked by 1 person

I love that kind of thing. I often keep any notes and any first drafts and second drafts because just in case I get famous… I think it’s cool to go back and look at how things started.

Sometimes when I’m struggling, it’s fun for me to go back and look at how I started the navigators, one of my more popular stories. Allison changed the beginning of her bestseller. We all do it it’s fun to see the evolution.

Liked by 1 person

This is interesting because each option and the comments open up worlds of possibility. It depends where we are going.
You could have the dramatic messenger from the governor/general with a stay of execution, or you could have a swash buckling rescue. You could have the end of a life, and as Frank suggest a protagonist watching, or the start of a novel which is a backstory as to how the person on the scaffold got there.
With these in mind I’d tend to go for something stark. ‘The drums were silent’ that is always atmospheric and sets the grim scene. Then next sentence ‘The noose embraced the neck’. Two short sharp statements, sets the scene and the rest is ‘ready to rock’

Liked by 2 people

Interestingly, I too thought the same as Frank when I read through the options.

“Every drum fell silent.” thrusts an immediate tension upon the reader, pushing them into a thorny bush of queries they’ll invariably tumble out of into the second sentence.

Why are there drums? Why were they playing? How were they playing? Why did they stop? Did they stop in unison? What would make them do that? When does that usually happen? Oh damn, I’m reading the next sentence now and it’s becoming clearer. This guy’s in trouble.

If I had to pick one, however, I’d probably go with number 3 because it’s the leanest. It implies that the rope must have been slipped over his head at one point before it was tightened, so we don’t need the added detail. It also encapsulates the more pressing of the two concerns — a noose slipped on, as in 2, can also be slipped off before it goes any further.

Additionally, omitting the action at this point opens up a new time dimension, as the noose might have been sitting around his neck throughout the thunderous drum roll. For whose benefit? An audience?

Maybe I’m reading into the possibilities too much, but I now have a scene in my head where an example is being made of this person. There’s the aspect of a macabre performance for the masses and final punishment of drawn-out shaming for the executed. It isn’t over too quickly. The readers have never known this person to be free — the noose has been there from the beginning of our brief relationship with the character. That will then colour any and every flashback with pathos, stepping stones towards a tragic demise.

Liked by 3 people

That’s a lot of information drawn from one sentence, but I would say you pretty much nailed it. This is an execution, circa 1750s or so, in one of the islands of the American colonies, and it is a military execution of a type of pirate.

Like

What do YOU think? Let me hear from ya.