Harry Potter and The Sorcerer’s Stone: The Movie Versus The Book

head shot
your humble host

 

It’s always interesting to see how a beloved book becomes a movie, and to observe what the movie makers decided to leave in or leave out.

 

(I recently did a 5-part series on things  I learned from JK Rowling. You can read it HERE)

 

For example, in the beginning of the book, Harry gets in trouble a lot because things just seem to happen when he’s around. Strange things like, oh, the glass wall that keeps the pythons contained at the zoo. It kind of disappears.

 

Or how he managed to somehow fly up onto the roof of the local public school when some bad kids were chasing him.

 

In the book, Harry doesn’t know that he is causing these things to happen. He is just as surprised as everyone else. In the movie, he seems pretty aware that he has caused something to happen when it does.

 

Probably the best way to describe the difference between the book and the movie is this:

In the movie version, it’s like your good friend read the book – and then enthusiastically told you the story.

 

img_8715
you can almost hear the Harry Potter music, can’t you?

They loved it. They spend more than two hours telling you the whole story – as much as they could remember.

 

They don’t tell you every single detail, of course, and you wouldn’t expect them to. But they would emphasize the things they enjoyed a lot or things that stood out to them.

 

So a lot of the detail would get left behind, and other things would get shortened. In movies, they tend to do that, and to combine things.

 

I would say the movie follows the story pretty faithfully, really just leaving behind a lot of details that you might not need… (I’m sure some die hard fans of the book will disagree. In an interview, the director said he really wanted to please fans of the book, that he felt he needed to do that.)

 

The challenges Harry and his friends face at the end were more like Indiana Jones in the movie, whereas they were more like Alice In Wonderland in the book. There, the movie may have been better.

 

The overly bright colors in the movie make everything look weird. The scenes where they’re not overdone are much better.


Allison 2 will keep you guessing at every turn

Ya know, if you’re gonna complain about other people’s movies and books, you better be ready to write one that’s better. So I did.

$2.99 eBook or FREE with Kindle Unlimited http://geni.us/navigators Now available in paperback!


Also, attention all movie makers: CGI makes everything just looks like I’m watching a cartoon. A nice, really well drawn cartoon, but a cartoon. You can do better. So do better.

 

Was the movie was pretty true to the book? I would say yes. Things they left out and rearranged, they weren’t that big of a deal to have been left out and rearranged.

img_8800
I mentioned Butterbeer was an acquired taste, right? When does that appear in the books?

Some of the stuff they left out was good, though… There, the book was better.

 

But if they left them all in, it would’ve been a five hour movie instead of two and a half hour movie. And two and a half hours was plenty.

 

Apparently.

 

Because millions and millions and millions of people thought so.

.

head shot
your humble host

Dan Alatorre is the author of several bestsellers and the amazingly great sci fi action thriller “The Navigators.” Click HERE to get your copy of The Navigators – FREE on Kindle Unlimited!

6 thoughts on “Harry Potter and The Sorcerer’s Stone: The Movie Versus The Book

What do YOU think? Let me hear from ya.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s